<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Senator Clinton and the Politically (In)correct Boob</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.booksonboobs.com/blog/2007/07/senator-clinton-and-the-politically-incorrect-boob/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.booksonboobs.com/blog/2007/07/senator-clinton-and-the-politically-incorrect-boob/</link>
	<description>Boob scoop on bras, breast health, cancer, breastfeeding, cosmetic surgery, and all the breast!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:28:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Snafu Suz</title>
		<link>http://www.booksonboobs.com/blog/2007/07/senator-clinton-and-the-politically-incorrect-boob/comment-page-1/#comment-7091</link>
		<dc:creator>Snafu Suz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 04:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksonboobs.com/blog/?p=43#comment-7091</guid>
		<description>Maybe I need to see the video, but I looked at that picture as closely as I could and I didn&#039;t see anything inappropriate.  What&#039;s all the fuss about?  The fuss is her being a woman running for president and they&#039;re trying to find any little thing they can to discredit her.  So lame.

I agree with Whitney - what country do we live in again?  We claim to be so great but we&#039;re sooooooo prudish it&#039;s ridiculous.  If that happened in France or Sweden no one would have blinked an eye.  It&#039;s not like she was wearing a wonderbra for god&#039;s sake!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I need to see the video, but I looked at that picture as closely as I could and I didn&#8217;t see anything inappropriate.  What&#8217;s all the fuss about?  The fuss is her being a woman running for president and they&#8217;re trying to find any little thing they can to discredit her.  So lame.</p>
<p>I agree with Whitney &#8211; what country do we live in again?  We claim to be so great but we&#8217;re sooooooo prudish it&#8217;s ridiculous.  If that happened in France or Sweden no one would have blinked an eye.  It&#8217;s not like she was wearing a wonderbra for god&#8217;s sake!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whitney Keyes</title>
		<link>http://www.booksonboobs.com/blog/2007/07/senator-clinton-and-the-politically-incorrect-boob/comment-page-1/#comment-7063</link>
		<dc:creator>Whitney Keyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 06:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksonboobs.com/blog/?p=43#comment-7063</guid>
		<description>GGreat post, Elisabeth! This is issue is important and very concerning. First, I can&#039;t believe your comment got deleted by the WSJ! Second, in the WSJ article you reference, how can the journalist say Clinton’s cleavage was “unnerving” - did the writer really mean to use that word? The war in Iraq is unnerving. Our country’s homeless situation is unnerving. Our national healthcare system - or lack there of - is unnerving. But Clinton’s cleavage? Surprising? Maybe. But unnerving? C’mon. And the comparison of seeing her cleavage to “catching a man with his fly unzipped.” That makes no sense. That is a completely different scenario. I was also shocked to learn that women on the Senate couldn’t wear pants until the 90’s. What country do we live in again? Iran? No, wait. I think it’s called the US. -Whitney Keyes, Executive Producer and Host, www.WhitneyandWyatt.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GGreat post, Elisabeth! This is issue is important and very concerning. First, I can&#8217;t believe your comment got deleted by the WSJ! Second, in the WSJ article you reference, how can the journalist say Clinton’s cleavage was “unnerving” &#8211; did the writer really mean to use that word? The war in Iraq is unnerving. Our country’s homeless situation is unnerving. Our national healthcare system &#8211; or lack there of &#8211; is unnerving. But Clinton’s cleavage? Surprising? Maybe. But unnerving? C’mon. And the comparison of seeing her cleavage to “catching a man with his fly unzipped.” That makes no sense. That is a completely different scenario. I was also shocked to learn that women on the Senate couldn’t wear pants until the 90’s. What country do we live in again? Iran? No, wait. I think it’s called the US. -Whitney Keyes, Executive Producer and Host, <a href="http://www.WhitneyandWyatt.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.WhitneyandWyatt.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
